CJI Ranjan Gogoi when citing evidence that Hindus continued praying there, at ram Chabutara, garbh griha, supreme court rules muslims have been unable to establish possessor right on the disputed property. Meanwhile prior to 1856-57, there was no exclusion of Hindus from praying there... exodus of Hindus from the inner courtyard remained contentious too.
Section 144 has been imposed in mumbai till 11 am tomorrow. Furthermore CJI led bench says “For 325 years, from the construction of the mosque till 1857, muslims have given no evidence of offering prayers at the disputed structure in exclusion of Hindus, it says. Destruction of the mosque in 1992 was in breach of sc order”. sc bench says “Muslims to get alternate land, rules CJI led Constitution bench of the Supreme Court." it says wrong committed must be limited.
Moreover CJI read out all pointers that
- Hindus to get land subject to conditions.
- Central government to frame a scheme
- A trust will be formed
- Inner courtyard will be handed over to the trust.
- A suitable plot of land measuring 5 acres shall be given to Sunni Waqf Board.
- Centre must set a trust with board of trustees within 3 months and under Article 142, sc directs in the scheme to be framed, Nirmohi Akhara to also get representation.
- Land to remain vested in statutory receiver till trust is formed.
- Trust to be formed in three months.
- Management of construction of the temple to be monitored by the trust.
